Fourth Circuit Limits the Guidelines Enhancement for Firearms with Altered Serial Numbers
The Fourth Circuit issued an important sentencing decision today for federal firearms cases. In United States v. Smith, No. 25-4065 (4th Cir.
We created Polales Horton & Leonardi with clients in mind. Our attorneys don’t take every case that comes through our doors. Our practice is focused. It’s that way to better serve our clients. We’ve accumulated knowledge over decades in specific areas of the law. And we use that experience to optimize outcomes for our clients.
We help individuals and corporate clients facing the full range of commercial litigation, including government investigations, shareholder and real estate disputes, breach of contract claims, and litigation related to product liability disputes.
We have a respected white collar criminal defense practice. Our reputation is the result of years of successfully representing clients involved in cases ranging from theft of trade secrets and computer crimes to fraud and tax crimes.
We know how hard you worked to bring your idea to life. We work just as hard to protect your rights related to its patent, trademark or copyright. Our team has successfully represented clients in court for disputes related to intellectual property.
We represent commercial insurance policyholders in cases where coverage is in dispute. The insurance provider is oftentimes contractually obligated to defend and indemnify the insured, but sometimes insurers wrongfully deny coverage for claims.
The Fourth Circuit issued an important sentencing decision today for federal firearms cases. In United States v. Smith, No. 25-4065 (4th Cir.
California has redrawn the excess insurer exhaustion rule. In Fox Paine & Company, LLC v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company (July 27,
Does a single occurrence insurance policy cover claims from multiple victims, or does each victim trigger a separate claim? That question sits